Theme 3: The Change Management to Overcome the Resistance to Change

Comments 11 Standard

I disagree with Mullins (2010:753), who argues that the resistance to change is determined by the personality of individuals and management can do little about it. In my point of view, the managers can develop and implant change management as to address new challenges and constant change, no matter what personalities that the employees possess.

Primarily, the author should not blame the personality of the individual for assuming all the responsibilities for the resistance to change (Mullins 2010: 753). The resistance to change can be classified into three levels. Firstly, the employee resistance is the top obstacle to change among all levels. Employees are afraid of the unknown and thus opposed to moving out of comfort. The second level is the middle-management resistance within the organization. As persons who interact directly with front-line employees, middle managers could pose a significant resistance to change. The third level of resistance to change is the corporate inertia and politics that may push back against the change initiative (Prosci Inc., 2014).

From the analysis above, the former two levels of resistances to change are due to personality, which are subjective conditions, while the latter one is an objective condition. It shows that the resistances to change not only comes the personality, but also from the corporate inertia. In this circumstance, the author is wrong by stating that the resistance to change is “all down to the personality of the individual” (Mullins 2010: 753).

Secondly and more importantly, the managers can address the resistance to change by implanting effect change management. The employees are not responsible for managing change. Instead, the responsibility for change management is with managers of an organization, who are expected to manage the change in a way that employees can cope with it. According to the benchmarking study in 2009, the managers are critical to the success of change management. The research data is shown below.

Figure 1:

The Importance of Manager and Supervisor Involvement to the Success of Change Efforts

Image

(Source: Prosci Inc., 2013)

From the figure above, it can be seen that in the participants’ perception, the management plays the critical role in managing changes. Half of the respondents have ranked the manager and supervisor involvement as the extremely important, with another one-third citing it as very important. Especially, the managers play five roles in avoiding and overcoming the resistance to change as below.

The first role that the managers play is the communicator in change management, by communicating with direct reports about the change. As employees wish to from how their work would be influenced by the changes, the managers should act as the key conduit of information about the organization, the work to be done and changes to that work after project completion.

The second role that the managers should play is the advocate by demonstrating their support for the change. In most cases, employees seek to evaluate the level of support for the change effort. Therefore, the management should reveal their support in an active way to the employees.

Also, the managers should play the role of coach by educating and training the employees through the change process. The managers are supposed to coach individuals through the change process and help them overcome the barriers to the ultimate success.

The fourth role that managers play is the liaison. This role requires the managers to interact with the project team by providing information not only from the project team to their direct reports, and vice versa.

Furthermore, the managers should also play a role of resistance manager by identifying and managing the resistances at all level (Prosci Inc., 2013).

Furthermore, it should be pointed out that the resistance can bring value to the change process. While managers are making efforts to implant strategies in the best interests of the organization, the productive resistant behaviors of employees can add value to the change processes by providing innovation, new insights, and the generation of new knowledge. These employees with contextual knowledge are likely to add change agendas to help them fit with local contexts (Cardiff Business School, 2013). In this way, the productive resistance can bring value to the change process.

An organizational example for change management is Hilton Hotels Corp (Hilton) that manages the human resource change process. During this process, the company sets performance incentives as the major criterion for its stuff salaries. During the change process, the managers play well the roles of communicator, advocate, coach, liaison, and resistance manager. Additionally, the managers listen to constructive feedbacks, resulting in value added in the change process.

In conclusion, the mangers in the hospitality industry should implant proper change management as to respond to the changes in business environment. Throughout the change process, while the managers should play critical role in managing changes, they should also pay attention to the productive resistance of employees that could add value to the change process.

References:

Chapman, A (2013) Change Management [online]. Available from: <http://www.businessballs.com/changemanagement.htm > [9 March 2014].

Chen, YC. (2011) ‘A Case Study on the Business Performance Management of Hilton Hotels Corp’, International Business Research, vol. 4, No. 2, April, pp. 213-218.

Prosci Inc. (2013)  ‘Managers and supervisors: importance and role’ [online]. Available from: <http://www.change-management.com/tutorial-job-roles-mod4.htm > [9 March 2014].

Prosci Inc. (2014) ‘Change Management Learning Center’ [online]. Available from: <http://www.change-management.com/tutorial-success-factors.htm > [9 March 2014].

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Theme 3: The Change Management to Overcome the Resistance to Change

  1. It is a good example of the video and Is capable of handling great stress with utmost ease and coming up with solutions that are out-of-the-box.The employee performance is reviewed after the set goals are met and the employees are rewarded accordingly. The merit of this method is that employees feel motivated to achieve the goals as they are a part of the goal-setting process.

  2. A very well structured work, clear showing the important of organizational change and how to overcome the resistance to change.

  3. Today, teams and organizations face rapid change like never before. Globalization has increased the markets and opportunities for more growth and revenue. However, increasingly diverse markets have a wide variety of needs and expectations that must be understood if they are to become strong customers and collaborators. So,the ability to manage change, while continuing to meet the needs of stakeholders, is a very important skill required by today’s leaders and managers.

    • What you said is totally right and reasonable. Why we need change management in the organization? It just adapt to the changeable micro environment. Change management fits the trend of the development of the business.

  4. I totally agree with you. Today, we can see some organization failed to the change management.The failure may be due to the manner in which change has been visualized, announced, and implemented or because internal resistance to it builds. Employees, in other words, sabotage those changes they view as antithetical to their own interests.

    • Just as you said, not every change management work effectively.There are some change management failed as a result. I think the reason is that the leader didn’t have a good understanding of the change in the micro environment. So the situation analysis is very important.

  5. I agree that we need make organization change in order to adapt to the economic environment.For an organizational change effort to succeed, leaders must understand motivation, context, receptivity, sequencing, and pace. They must communicate effectively and pull the right levers at the right moment in a dynamic situation. Things rarely go according to plan, in no small part because humans are more at ease with the status quo.

    • I got some new ideas from your comments, thank you so much. Yes, leader not only need to under the micro environment, but also need to understand the change in their employees. Because the success of the company need everyone’s effort.

  6. I also agree with you that the resistance to change can also bring important insight. Managers and leaders can and have to do something regarding this resistance by starting to hear employees ideas and ask what they thing is wrong, what they wanted to change and what do they think about certain measures. In the end the final decision is the Manager’s but in the meantime they learnt a lot about the jobs within organisation and they also gained the employees’ support in the process.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s